🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime genre has a new medium, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: police body cam footage. Countenances of those harmed, observers and possible perpetrators appear suddenly to the cameras, sometimes in the intense brightness of headlights or torches as the police arrive, their expressions and tones expressing wariness or panic or indignation or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we often incidentally glimpse the faces of the law enforcement personnel, one waiting impassively while the other asks the questions with what sometimes seems like remarkable hesitation – though perhaps this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Documentary Filmmaking

We have already had the streaming service true-crime documentary The Gabby Petito Case, about the killing of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, composed entirely of body cam film. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the grim case of a Florida mother in a city in Florida, a woman of colour whose children allegedly harassed and tormented her white neighbour, a local resident. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the police were repeatedly called, Lorincz fatally shot Owens through her locked door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to confront her about hurling items at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The investigating authorities found proof that the suspect had done internet searches into Florida’s “stand your ground” laws, which permit householders and others to shoot if there is a reasonable belief of danger. The documentary builds its story with the officer recordings generated during the repeated police visits to the location before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered incident site itself – prefaced by emergency call recordings of Lorincz calling the police in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also police cell footage of Lorincz which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The film does not really imply anything too complicated about the neighbor, or any mitigating factors. She is obviously disturbed, although the children are heard calling her “the Karen”, an ugly jibe. The production is presented as an example of how “stand your ground” laws lead to senseless and tragic violence. But the fact of gun ownership and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a late commentator famously claimed made gun deaths a price worth paying) is not much emphasized.

Police Interrogation and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel astonished at how minimal concern the officers took in this point. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they may have done in recordings that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so normal it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Detention and Consequences

For what appeared to her neighbors a extended period, the suspect was not even taken into custody and indicted, only detained and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another point of comparison, incidentally, with the a prior incident). And when she was ultimately officially taken into custody in the holding cell, there is an remarkable scene in which Lorincz simply declines to rise, will not extend her arms for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the politely self-pitying air of someone whose psychological state means that she just can’t do it. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this could be effective?

Conclusion and Verdict

It was not successful; and the panel's decision is revealed in the end titles. A deeply sobering picture of American crime and punishment.